Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using alternative fuels?

The correct answer identifies increased cost for consumers as a non-benefit of using alternative fuels. While alternative fuels can lead to various advantages—such as reducing harmful pollutants that negatively affect air quality, decreasing dependence on oil which enhances energy security, and potentially lowering greenhouse gas emissions, particularly when sourced and consumed sustainably—the aspect of increased cost for consumers is not a benefit.

In fact, the transition to alternative fuels can often involve significant initial investments in technology, infrastructure, and new fuel systems, which can translate to higher costs for consumers in the short term. In many cases, the overall goal of adopting alternative fuels is to provide a long-term economic benefit and environmental sustainability, which can offset initial costs over time. However, the immediate financial burden does not align with the notion of a "benefit." Therefore, recognizing increased cost as a non-benefit helps clarify the broader context of alternative fuel adoption and its implications on consumer economics.